Batch Grader lab · essay_grader v1.6.5

← Back to batch

2669 Thomasjawana

thomasjawana_2669_418192_FAMILY OF ORIGIN.docx · queued

Grade source: llm

Evidence

Writing and APA

Auto: 72.0 / 100.0

Developing: The word count (446) meets the >350 requirement. However, there are APA errors requiring revision: 1) In-text citation year mismatch ('Cohen & Strong, 2021' in text vs '2020' required per textbook edition provided; also reference list is cut off mid-sentence). 2) Reference entry is incomplete (missing publisher and full title formatting). These are substantive APA issues affecting the documentation criterion.

Concrete Detail

Auto: 20.0 / 20.0

Excellent: The student provides specific behaviors and moments ('In the winter of 2018,' 'my parents argued,' 'the silence that followed'). No empty generalizations.

Growth Reflection

Auto: 20.0 / 20.0

Excellent: The student addresses all three components: a value to keep (faith), a specific learning opportunity (patience with others' perspectives), and a relationship skill (empathy in conflict).

Social Class Connection

Auto: 20.0 / 20.0

Excellent: The student addresses institutional connections (school, church) and cultural symbols. The link to the value of faith is clear.

Value Identification

Auto: 20.0 / 20.0

Excellent: The student explicitly identifies 'faith' as the specific family value. This is concrete and clear.

final_evaluation
{
  "rationale": "The student demonstrates a clear narrative arc, identifying faith as a specific family value and connecting it to social class and institutional influences with good coherence. The growth reflection is present but relies on clich\u00e9 phrasing ('hope', 'figure things out') rather than precise behavioral or skill-based language. While the word count meets the 350 minimum, the APA formatting contains significant errors: the in-text citation year (2021) conflicts with the prompt's specified edition (Cohen & Strong, 2020), and the reference list is truncated, missing the publisher and location entirely. Additionally, specific claims about social class influence lack page citations, weakening the academic rigor.",
  "fulfillment": "partial",
  "top_priority_revisions": [
    "Update the reference list to match the specified 14th edition (2020) by Cohen & Strong, including the publisher (Cengage Learning) and location",
    "Revise the Growth Reflection to replace vague clich\u00e9s with specific adult values or skills (e.g., resilience, active listening) tied to concrete examples",
    "Add page numbers to any claims derived from the textbook regarding how institutions shape family values"
  ],
  "missing_or_weak_elements": [
    "Specific behavioral or skill-based language in the Growth Reflection (currently uses generic phrases like 'hope' instead of precise values)",
    "Complete APA Reference List entry (publisher and location are missing; edition number is ambiguous due to year mismatch)",
    "Page citations for claims regarding social class influence"
  ]
}
integrity_review
{
  "desklib": {
    "note": "Desklib stylistic classifier only \u2014 not proof of AI use; false positives occur on polished student / L2 writing.",
    "label": "ai",
    "model": "desklib/ai-text-detector-v1.01",
    "device": "cuda",
    "threshold": 0.5,
    "chunk_count": 1,
    "ai_probability": 0.6396,
    "_desklib_available": true,
    "pattern_likelihood_band": "moderate",
    "max_chunk_ai_probability": 0.6396,
    "mean_chunk_ai_probability": 0.6396
  },
  "canary_review": {
    "hits": [],
    "week": 2,
    "title": "Family of Origin Reflection",
    "course": "PSYC-1213",
    "marker": "AI_CANARY_W02",
    "misses": [
      {
        "needle": "origin-schema recoding"
      },
      {
        "needle": "Varela & Moss (2020)"
      },
      {
        "needle": "origin-schema recoding using a FOO typology grid"
      }
    ],
    "policy": "soft_flag_on_hit",
    "matched": true,
    "summary": "Plant canaries: 0/3 needles found in submission.",
    "canvas_id": 45784,
    "soft_flag": false,
    "match_mode": "plant",
    "match_reason": "canvas_id",
    "soft_flag_reason": "",
    "_canary_available": true
  },
  "citation_review": {
    "summary": "Checked 1 references (0 not found, 1 metadata mismatch); 0 quotes (0 without nearby citation).",
    "quotes_checked": [],
    "references_checked": [
      {
        "raw": "Cohen, T. F., & Strong, B. (2021). The marriage and family experience: Intimate relationships in a changing society (14th ed.). Cengage",
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12915",
        "notes": "Year mismatch vs lookup.",
        "status": "mismatch",
        "provider": "crossref",
        "topic_fit": "unknown",
        "resolved_doi": "10.1111/jomf.12915",
        "resolved_year": 2023,
        "resolved_title": "The changing face of intimate premarital relationships in Taiwan",
        "abstract_snippet": " Abstract   Objective  This paper examines changing intimate premarital relationships in Taiwan .     Background  Marriages have been on the decline. Whether these foregone marriages are associated with a rise in cohabitation or other alternatives have become central to a thorough understanding of family changes, yet relevant research on Taiwan is limited.    Methods  The Taiwan Fertility and Fami"
      }
    ],
    "_citation_available": true
  },
  "ai_patterns_noticed": [],
  "_integrity_available": true,
  "other_issues_noticed": [
    {
      "issue": "Reference metadata mismatch: The text cites 'Cohen & Strong (2021)' and lists a book title, but the citation database lookup found no matching record for that exact combination; instead it retrieved an unrelated article with a different year (2023) and DOI. This suggests the reference entry may be incomplete or incorrect rather than plagiarized text.",
      "severity": "low",
      "evidence_quote": "According to Marriage and Family Experience, families are not separate from society... (Cohen & Strong, 2021)."
    }
  ],
  "recommend_human_review": true,
  "ai_assistance_likelihood": "none",
  "limitations_of_screening": "This screening is based on pattern recognition and database lookups only. It cannot definitively rule out subtle AI assistance or confirm the accuracy of student citations without instructor verification.",
  "recommended_review_reason": "Citation/quote flags: 1 reference issues, 0 quote concerns.",
  "plagiarism_or_originality_flags": []
}

Your grade

Total: / 100.0